From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F9E993E for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA709E3 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:53:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Peter =?iso-8859-1?q?H=FCwe?= To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 23:55:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201507122355.20513.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Follow-Up(s) on previous Kernel Summits | KSummit Archive List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, I'm reading along ksummit-discuss for quite a while and I definitely see a lot of topics reoccurring each year -- also a lot of arguments and standpoints are similar each year :) Does it make sense to reserve a slot to revisit the topics of the previous KS, check their status and the agreed actions back then? Tinyfication, Stable Flow, 2038... just to name a few. And a bit related I just wanted to point to Paul McKenneys great summary of previous KSs: http://ftp.be.debian.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/paulmck/LKS/ Thanks, Peter