From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29502BCC for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com [209.85.220.43]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6E32F2 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pacgz10 with SMTP id gz10so99893411pac.3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:11:38 -0700 From: Guenter To: Tim Bird Message-ID: <20150710201138.GB9469@groeck-UX31A> References: <201507080121.41463.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> <559C73DF.2030008@roeck-us.net> <20150708114011.3a1f1861@noble> <2879113.fraeuJIr2M@avalon> <20150709193718.GD9169@vmdeb7> <1436481109.3324.219.camel@infradead.org> <20150710003559.GT11162@sirena.org.uk> <20150710020706.GH111846@vmdeb7> <20150710155144.34dde697@gandalf.local.home> <55A02504.6040003@sonymobile.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55A02504.6040003@sonymobile.com> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Recruitment (Reviewers, Testers, Maintainers, Hobbyists) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 01:03:16PM -0700, Tim Bird wrote: > On 07/10/2015 12:51 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:07:06 -0700 > > Darren Hart wrote: > > > > > >> As far as recruitment goes, I think we're talking about barriers to first-timers > >> and such - and git-send-email is one of those things. Eventually, a developer > > > > +1000 > > > > I still don't use git-send-email, as I afraid that I'll blow it and end > > up sending a thousand patches to every developer that ever touched the > > kernel ;-) > > I'm in exactly the same boat. I don't submit patches frequently enough > that I trust a git-send-email workflow. It's too automated for me. > I'd rather take the extra time to manually format my patch e-mails and my > CC: lists, than be embarrassed. Of course then I make manual mistakes > and end up getting embarrassed sometimes anyway, but I can usually > avoid a patch embarrassment armageddon. > I use git send-email, but I don't use it blindly. If I use it directly, I give it a trial first with --dry-run. For patch series I use a directory to collect the patches and then use a script to actually send them. Sometimes I also use --cc-cmd with a script I have written to automatically add Cc's, but never without dry-run. Guenter