From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB869ABF for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A61FD for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 22:38:30 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: josh@joshtriplett.org Message-ID: <20150709203830.GF7021@wotan.suse.de> References: <201507080121.41463.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> <559C73DF.2030008@roeck-us.net> <20150708114011.3a1f1861@noble> <2879113.fraeuJIr2M@avalon> <20150709193718.GD9169@vmdeb7> <20150709201127.GA3426@cloud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150709201127.GA3426@cloud> Cc: Jason Cooper , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Recruitment (Reviewers, Testers, Maintainers, Hobbyists) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 01:11:27PM -0700, josh@joshtriplett.org wrote: > Bonus if this is also wired into the 0day bot, so that you also find out > if you introduce a new warning or error. No reason to make bots do stupid work, if we really wanted to consider this a bit more seriously the pipeline could be: mailing-list | coccinelle coccicheck| smatch | sparse | 0-day-bot That would make the 0-day-bot chain only do sensible things. My undestanding is that the 0-day bot now has Coccinelle integration though, not so sure of the rest, if the pipline is already set up then the auto-patch-merging is the only next step needed, can patchwork do that for some subsystem already set up ? It should just be a matter of adding a git repo and adding it to the list of 0-day bot git repos. Luis