From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:40:29 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20140819154029.GE5423@mwanda>
References: <20140819144839.GA1270@thunk.org>
	<20140819145547.GB18536@roeck-us.net>
	<20140819152350.GE11085@thunk.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140819152350.GE11085@thunk.org>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] No more module removal -- Unconference track
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

Why can't we just taint the kernel on module removal?

regards,
dan carpenter