From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81FF0B08 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5971F97E for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id v10so9818675pde.11 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 07:51:40 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Andy Lutomirski Message-ID: <20140819145140.GA18536@roeck-us.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Hallway/unconference track: easy QEMU-based testing tools List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:37:27AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > I have a tool (virtme) for easy kernel testing, and I think that several of > you have similar or complementary things. I think it would we worthwhile > to spend ten minutes or so to compare notes and use cases. We have a session scheduled for kselftest, which as I understand will cover qemu based testing as well. 11am in Ontario conference room. Guenter