From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 695C3995 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [74.207.234.97]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAE542025A for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 12:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:24:13 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o To: Andy Lutomirski Message-ID: <20140818122413.GF23084@thunk.org> References: <87lhqmxyxn.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20140818040014.GA10623@mail.hallyn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Mount API? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 09:03:52PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > I'm quite certain Eric will at least be at the venue. Eric? > > > > > > I am here and I will be here all week. > > > > > > With respect to bind mounts I was mentioning a patch that someone > > > was actively working on a week or two ago to allow at least the > read-only > > > flag to be specified when a bind mount is created. > > > > > > For a whole new clean mount API I don't know. I do think it would be > > > productive for us to get together and talk. Weather that is at the > > > container session on Friday or elswhere I don't know. > > > > If Al isn't there on M-T, then Friday works great for me. > > I'll be gone then. Oh, well. This sounds like a perfect 30 minute slot for Tuesday's "unconference" track. Someone want to try to suggest a slot? Go to http://goo.gl/xmeoSd and leave a comment on a time slot you'd like to propose.... - Ted