From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF9A046 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk (mezzanine.sirena.org.uk [106.187.55.193]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7F4E20320 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:33:46 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <20140814153346.GZ17528@sirena.org.uk> References: <20140813180743.GB16662@roeck-us.net> <20140813224507.GA29606@roeck-us.net> <20140814001450.GW17528@sirena.org.uk> <20140814003827.GA359@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uQ0m6R+2sT9gTfoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140814003827.GA359@roeck-us.net> Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] RFC: Kernel tinification - kernel config reduction List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --uQ0m6R+2sT9gTfoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 05:38:27PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:14:50AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > arm64 should work most of the time - I've been building it daily and > > reporting the results, it's also pretty clear of warnings which is good. > > There's a couple of disappointing problems at the minute though. > >=20 > I don't get past > scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c: In function 'main': > scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.c:190:1: sorry, unimplemented: function > profiling > This is with gcc 4.8.1 for aarch64, built from buildroot, and host gcc > 4.8.2-19ubuntu1. Do I need a new/different compiler ? Sounds like it - I use the Linaro toolchains. > > > arm:allmodconfig was quite useful, but it has been broken since 3.10 = or so, > > > and I don't think it will ever get fixed. > > Why not? > Beats me. The longer it is broken, the more difficult it will become > to fix it, and thus less likely. There are people who actively care about that configuration though. --uQ0m6R+2sT9gTfoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT7NbWAAoJELSic+t+oim9/OgQAIxJ0mF9e+940heHJOwQgKsz 8HVzm6ct+bZwHqq4zrQmWKb8PJwBTwdXFysyq+bGRnyRx37RNvpoGgYzbHgzhBkx R7s4gQGQGkwMte6nxGKDCeI3KT0ITc6E+HifyhgntmTG7petEMZKu0XtnrQv5zbj T+6Q14buOiBat6/3mbQoP1zcrFabWwy4ILmVZRMsU+/wGGjjgWoDIYDECF4iQkxK W+Emx3/wMA17N9jWZcqLYKQhJZru4k6NqAB14Eugv9OiMBaHD6gF5dKt55EdHg5h KeJ+FuTK/pJ+ueRW4b9vsn7BnpiKsGdG2IMO+sAnVKTuva4pEOTuPczGksVg3Xbp SuZODaN+RNqb7VUibAX9U7MbExMNm2v0yJXz3ggnhU1Of802U5jNpqmhzvErcx0Q gxG30Y+3WWYXo6bwiJwppfR/b1tm4ao2j09siKKsnceaceyjYYrZcVFyttls3F// ZP2UF+w0dLUS0oYjEsiblaJLCjhr6ODo8ACDbrbmM6RdYKtIkmucx5Rm0NysME5L GkfqzH6QZy+cgQvDlwh2YjaKlrUQM6SCQspZ6ZB1pZJ+6BtBDG2JkczFDvpJSGnE F9bumxH0/oSwxMxOA2QI+Kf6HZ212ag7TpWHG/XK9XYgVKY18mz5WRKOoMlVUqEt U4MxPbXbv8ZYIHcwmsr1 =VdjE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uQ0m6R+2sT9gTfoC--