From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85BF70A for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE2C2025B for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:33:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:33:33 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Message-ID: <20140812143333.GB3270@quack.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] printk unconference List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, I've just requested slot for printk unconference on Tuesday Aug 19 at 11:00 (after morning break). I would like to find there some solution for printk softlockups we are seeing which is acceptable for all parties (you can read more details in my original proposal at http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2014-May/000598.html). Sasha and Jiri also expressed interest in discussing some topics regarding printk in the thread (printk tinification, printk inside NMI - although that is getting resolved AFAIK). Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR