From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6375B847 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 00:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E141F2023F for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 00:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBFE21DBB for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 20:19:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 17:23:31 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Linus Walleij Message-ID: <20140605002331.GB24037@kroah.com> References: <537F3551.2070104@hitachi.com> <20140528153702.GU23991@suse.de> <20140528185748.GA30673@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] kernel testing standard List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:07:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:37:02PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > >> As LTP is reported to > >> be sane these days for some tests, it could conceivably be wrapped by "make > >> test" to avoid duplicating effort there. I think that would be worthwhile > >> if someone had the time to push it because it would be an unconditional win. > > > > That is what I have been asking for for _years_. Hopefully someday > > someone does this... > > Does this read "let's pull LTP into the kernel source tree"? Everyone always asks this, and I say, "Sure, why not?" Actually, if people do complain about "why", then let's take the "useful" subset of LTP for kernel developers. It's a great place to start, don't you agree? thanks, greg k-h