From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0D47FE for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:53:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61441F8BA for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:53:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 12:53:46 +1000 From: NeilBrown To: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <20140602125346.13988855@notabene.brown> In-Reply-To: <538BE4DE.6050200@infradead.org> References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <1401304315.13546.142.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> <20140528191514.GE13255@tuxdriver.com> <20140530105938.62fd566d@gandalf.local.home> <20140530151026.GE24054@tuxdriver.com> <1401484253.2364.3.camel@dabdike> <538BE4DE.6050200@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/IXcAMdCNZ2P0PSZ/TZosvZv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --Sig_/IXcAMdCNZ2P0PSZ/TZosvZv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 19:43:42 -0700 Randy Dunlap wro= te: > On 05/30/2014 02:10 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 11:10 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:15:14 -0400 > >>> "John W. Linville" wrote: > >> > >>>> I hate to bikeshed this, but "Maintainer-acked-by" seems too long to= type... > >>>> > >>> > >>> Yeah, I wouldn't want to type that. What about: > >>> > >>> Approved-by: ... > >>> > >>> That is reserved for maintainers only? > >> > >> If we need such a tag, I like this verion better. > >=20 > > Bikeshedded-by:? > >=20 > > Discussed-in-circles-by:? > >=20 > > Maintainer-penguin-pee-blessed-by:? > >=20 > > OK, it's late here; but for the record, I think Acked-by is perfectly > > clear and we don't need a new tag. >=20 > Acked-by: me >=20 >=20 Are you just saying that you agree, or are you affirming this in your status as MAINTAINER of the documentation? - Confused --Sig_/IXcAMdCNZ2P0PSZ/TZosvZv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBU4vnOjnsnt1WYoG5AQLJ0w/+Ne3C/3C9c3Lur5ZXnybDyR3I7SG+yzD5 /QiLM/GFkN+YtAvZoJ9QApxPfxW4sHlHYgFQ2d9dh10qHkNDlM89sXYL2T6J1kyO o+rb9fYDRTwZEUiCHjSlH9q6Zd+rbVPBb+fXFwcQ4vkLji+xrjwaNdd0k2po5XCb sUXEDIQyx7BP45JGkB/Kh0UxXQPsHor9rklCa0skn/TLse6VQ+K4Pb/Fmo7Erq55 wywQQF+ocUynk8LKQjpxkqksEwbYobpb1Lc4q6PL/2B5yByYHdc+nXLkGRuXbEl0 c/8bOaiwZAAmwjqgv4wKR5bPohamuDmQEYptx84gkkqGaVNkZ5MdJ+GuS4YBUcO+ TXJNcabqCULJaN/qt22RkOq5+EyXSt3pyTQpKkEctva4cAndrVtC1zW265mEoZQe sd9wptQPF6mEHz42CVxpOMq4BqP8QS9XkTIMLpfa44fZNRua6Wso1YcYxFa15AdY RTrl7+GQAsTP5jVVcghcgLz9Q4ABa49bUh9/H9a4M8hRTfPUKYaKPWvW39Gk70iR qdJqiEI4cD1+tHJV6YwZmLqEgwHU+sEPh7mG7CoADgPpeSbHUni+Pv5y+//YmaI8 UhiUGr2QnxK/fMhFyKNwsLuJKQbZOz5aQyuhx88DjuHefk9diEOrzM7uOOdCGiVe q8BNEpblsCs= =Crr1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/IXcAMdCNZ2P0PSZ/TZosvZv--