On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 19:43:42 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 05/30/2014 02:10 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 11:10 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > >> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > >>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:15:14 -0400 > >>> "John W. Linville" wrote: > >> > >>>> I hate to bikeshed this, but "Maintainer-acked-by" seems too long to type... > >>>> > >>> > >>> Yeah, I wouldn't want to type that. What about: > >>> > >>> Approved-by: ... > >>> > >>> That is reserved for maintainers only? > >> > >> If we need such a tag, I like this verion better. > > > > Bikeshedded-by:? > > > > Discussed-in-circles-by:? > > > > Maintainer-penguin-pee-blessed-by:? > > > > OK, it's late here; but for the record, I think Acked-by is perfectly > > clear and we don't need a new tag. > > Acked-by: me > > Are you just saying that you agree, or are you affirming this in your status as MAINTAINER of the documentation? - Confused