From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68C3AF4 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 21:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.226]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B5F20318 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 21:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 17:30:28 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: James Bottomley Message-ID: <20140530173028.61d50e96@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1401484253.2364.3.camel@dabdike> References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <1401304315.13546.142.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> <20140528191514.GE13255@tuxdriver.com> <20140530105938.62fd566d@gandalf.local.home> <20140530151026.GE24054@tuxdriver.com> <1401484253.2364.3.camel@dabdike> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 30 May 2014 17:10:53 -0400 James Bottomley wrote: > > Bikeshedded-by:? > > Discussed-in-circles-by:? > > Maintainer-penguin-pee-blessed-by:? > > OK, it's late here; but for the record, I think Acked-by is perfectly > clear and we don't need a new tag. Pissed-off-James-Bottomely-by: Steven Rostedt -- Steve