From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16F19AE for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0CC0200A9 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:10:27 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Steven Rostedt Message-ID: <20140530151026.GE24054@tuxdriver.com> References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <1401304315.13546.142.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> <20140528191514.GE13255@tuxdriver.com> <20140530105938.62fd566d@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140530105938.62fd566d@gandalf.local.home> Cc: James Bottomley , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 28 May 2014 15:15:14 -0400 > "John W. Linville" wrote: > > I hate to bikeshed this, but "Maintainer-acked-by" seems too long to type... > > > > Yeah, I wouldn't want to type that. What about: > > Approved-by: ... > > That is reserved for maintainers only? If we need such a tag, I like this verion better. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.