From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70467ACB for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.232]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B097F201E2 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:22:11 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jan Kara Message-ID: <20140530112211.12ad856b@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20140530130728.GB2419@quack.suse.cz> References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20140529182753.GJ25041@thunk.org> <700704721.GMn4j9GJx9@vostro.rjw.lan> <20140529233004.GB11741@kroah.com> <20140530130728.GB2419@quack.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Bottomley , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Reforming Acked-by (was Re: [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 30 May 2014 15:07:28 +0200 Jan Kara wrote: > > This is not only about managers / company. Reviewers does not seem > > to have much recognition in upstream community either. For example > > we do take into account s-o-b when creating preliminary list of > > people to get invited to kernel summit, but we do _not_ take into > > account reviewd-by (or has anything changed?)... > Reviewed-by *is* taken into account for KS selection. It is even > positively biased against s-o-b AFAIK. Yes, it is very much taken into account. But so is all other activities. How much you participate is a key factor in KS selection. If you submit a 1000 patches in your little subsystem but don't make any attempt to review other patches or get involved with the rest of the kernel, you are very unlikely to be invited. -- Steve