From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3083298F for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 18:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8009120114 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 18:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:36:11 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Daniel Vetter Message-ID: <20140529183611.GA30922@kroah.com> References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20140524111927.GA3455@katana> <4700397.FLxRVChBLf@vostro.rjw.lan> <1401294020.13546.95.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> <20140528162833.GA23815@thin> <20140528233145.GA14933@cloud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: James Bottomley , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:31:52PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Of course for both these points Intel mostly gets this and I only have > issues with new people joining upstream from e.g. Android teams If > they don't get it I escalate through their managers _real_ quickly. > Maybe we should require from companies some "you have a loose cannon, > take care of it" contact, at least those in lf/linaro/... to make sure > this gets addressed quickly? Since ime sternly written mails at > engineers is usually not sufficient, escalation is usually required. The LF does have such a list, email me, or the LF Tech board if you need such a contact for an issue like this. We've done it in the past and have no problem doing it in the future :) thanks, greg k-h