From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154FB996 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 18:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.225]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C8A2019A for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 18:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 14:43:32 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Thomas Gleixner Message-ID: <20140529144332.570be36a@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20140524111927.GA3455@katana> <4700397.FLxRVChBLf@vostro.rjw.lan> <20140528143246.GV15585@mwanda> <20140528163902.GA5099@sirena.org.uk> <1401295862.13546.109.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> <20140528173553.GE5099@sirena.org.uk> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F328205B1@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> <20140528183825.GA21477@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Bottomley , Dan Carpenter , Mark Brown , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 28 May 2014 23:32:11 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner wrote: \ > What you really want is: > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/MESSAGE_ID_OF_PATCH > > It's way more useful than any of the v1-n writeups, which are most of > the time just a completely waste of electrons. Even if written well, > without the actual review context they are pretty pointless. Agreed! And unfortunately, even that doesn't work because version patches usually start a new thread, and you lose out on what discussions were made before it. Lately, I've been adding more than one Link: tag. It may be overkill, but when I post a v2 patch series, I try to have changes to the patches have a Link tag that point to the discussion that caused the changes. If I have v5 (which I haven't had more than a v2 lately), I would recommend having 4 Link tags that point to the posting of all previous versions of the patch in order to be able to read the entire discussion in the future. -- Steve