From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2DA9C3 for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vena.lwn.net (tex.lwn.net [70.33.254.29]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 226F11FD4A for ; Wed, 28 May 2014 17:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 13:05:44 -0400 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Josh Triplett Message-ID: <20140528130544.2f7495b8@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20140528162833.GA23815@thin> References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20140524111927.GA3455@katana> <4700397.FLxRVChBLf@vostro.rjw.lan> <1401294020.13546.95.camel@dhcp-9-2-203-236.watson.ibm.com> <20140528162833.GA23815@thin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: James Bottomley , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 28 May 2014 09:28:33 -0700 Josh Triplett wrote: > Or perhaps in LWN's statistics, which focus on Signed-off-by but don't > mention Reviewed-by at all. I occasionally put up a table with Reviewed-by (and Reported-by) stats, but the absolute numbers are generally quite small, so the interest seems to be low. But I should revisit that, it's been a little while. jon