From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614E426 for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E686D1FAB5 for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 01:29:23 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: James Bottomley Message-ID: <20140525222923.GW15585@mwanda> References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I think SCSI is almost uniquely difficult for this. The drivers are so big and different from each other. Competitors aren't going to review each other's code. With almost every other subsystem, there is a second in command who could take over if needed. I don't know anyone who could do your job if you decided to go back to Cambridge for an MBA. I did a: git log --after=2013-01-01 drivers/scsi | grep '\-by\:' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn There are some smart people who work on vendor code but everyone seems focussed on their own code. regards, dan carpenter