ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] [nomination] Move Fast and Oops Things
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 10:11:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140523141111.GA13311@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400826095.2259.38.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:21:35PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 22:56 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Dan Carpenter
> > <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:31:44AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > >> I agree that something like this is prickly once it gets entangled
> > >> with ABI concerns.  But, I disagree with the speed argument... unless
> > >> you believe -staging has not increased the velocity of kernel
> > >> development?
> > >
> > > Staging is good because it brings more developers, but in many cases it
> > > is a slow down.  Merged codes has stricter rules where you have to write
> > > reviewable patches.  If there is a bug early in a patch series then you
> > > can't just fix it in a later patch, you need to redo the whole series.
> > 
> > In theory...
> > 
> > These days many fixes end up as separate commits in various subsystem
> > trees, due to "no rebase" rules and other regulations.
> 
> No, pretty much in practise.  I've no qualms about dropping a patch
> series if one of the git tree tests shows problems and, since I have a
> mostly linear tree, that means a rebase.
> 
>   I also don't believe in "preserving" history which is simply bug fixes
> that should have been in the series.  Sometimes, if the fix took a while
> to track down, I might keep the separate patch for credit + learning,
> but most of the time I'd fold it into a commit and annotate the commit.

That's all well and good, but rebasing causes a lot of pain.  This is
particularly true when you have downstream trees.

In any case, bugs will eventually show-up -- probably on the day after
you merge the 'final' series.  Hopefully those are not 'brown paper bag'
bugs, but you can only stall a series so long in hopes of shaking
those out.  You can only extend yourself so far in pursuit of bisectability.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-23 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-15 23:13 Dan Williams
2014-05-16  2:56 ` NeilBrown
2014-05-16 15:04   ` Chris Mason
2014-05-16 17:09     ` Andy Grover
2014-05-23  8:11       ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-16 18:31     ` Randy Dunlap
2014-05-21  7:48     ` Dan Williams
2014-05-21  7:55       ` Greg KH
2014-05-21  9:05         ` Matt Fleming
2014-05-21 12:52           ` Greg KH
2014-05-21 13:23             ` Matt Fleming
2014-05-21  8:25       ` NeilBrown
2014-05-21  8:36         ` Dan Williams
2014-05-21  8:53           ` Matt Fleming
2014-05-21 10:11           ` NeilBrown
2014-05-21 15:35             ` Dan Williams
2014-05-21 23:06               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-21 23:03                 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-21 23:40                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-05-22  0:10                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-05-22 15:48                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-22 16:31                     ` Dan Williams
2014-05-22 17:38                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-22 18:42                       ` Dan Williams
2014-05-22 19:06                         ` Chris Mason
2014-05-22 20:31                       ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-22 20:56                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-05-23  6:21                           ` James Bottomley
2014-05-23 14:11                             ` John W. Linville [this message]
2014-05-24  9:14                               ` James Bottomley
2014-05-24 19:19                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-05-23  2:13                       ` Greg KH
2014-05-23  3:03                         ` Dan Williams
2014-05-23  7:44                           ` Greg KH
2014-05-23 14:02                         ` Josh Boyer
2014-05-21 23:48               ` NeilBrown
2014-05-22  4:04                 ` Dan Williams
2014-05-21  7:22   ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140523141111.GA13311@tuxdriver.com \
    --to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox