From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tytso@thunk.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8095C988
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 22 May 2014 15:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [74.207.234.97])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4569E2020C
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 22 May 2014 15:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:51:30 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Message-ID: <20140522155130.GB28971@thunk.org>
References: <s5hvbt9izdm.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<20140516030708.GV27822@titan.lakedaemon.net>
	<s5h1tvuf4ov.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
	<20140522.064910.1233749401586905587.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140522.064910.1233749401586905587.chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, johan@herland.net,
	jason@lakedaemon.net, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Metadata addendum to git commit
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 06:49:10AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> 
> I told Junio and Johan about this discussion, and Junio, as he did not
> find a good way to subscribe to the list as a newcomer and still send
> a response to an existing thread, said that I can forward the
> following.

If someone sends a message who is not on the list, it goes into a
moderation queue.  When I approve such requests, I'll also whitelist
that particular e-mail address, so the 4-8 hour latency should only
apply for the first e-mail address from a particular e-mail address.

So just reply to the message; it will eventually make it out to the
whole list.  My approval time will generally be faster during US
business hours.

Cheers,

						- Ted