From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78954C6 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 20:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9006A20221 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 20:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id rq2so1553858pbb.17 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:29:49 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg KH Message-ID: <20140515202949.GA1462@roeck-us.net> References: <1399595490.2230.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <5372D6E4.2080009@huawei.com> <53751887.1040809@zytor.com> <20140515200019.GB4288@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140515200019.GB4288@kroah.com> Cc: Sarah Sharp , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, James Bottomley , Julia Lawall , Darren Hart , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Kernel tinification: shrinking the kernel and avoiding size regressions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:00:19PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:41:59PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > > I think kernel tinification and what should be acceptable goals and > > non-goals for the mainline kernel would make an excellent KS topic. > > Personally, I am for stretching Linux as far across the compute spectrum > > as it can possibly go. > > I'll second this for both a valid topic, and as a goal for Linux to > achieve. > Not that it matters much ;-), but same here. Guenter