From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:00:19 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "H. Peter Anvin" Message-ID: <20140515200019.GB4288@kroah.com> References: <1399595490.2230.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <5372D6E4.2080009@huawei.com> <53751887.1040809@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53751887.1040809@zytor.com> Cc: Sarah Sharp , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, James Bottomley , Julia Lawall , Darren Hart , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Kernel tinification: shrinking the kernel and avoiding size regressions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:41:59PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > I think kernel tinification and what should be acceptable goals and > non-goals for the mainline kernel would make an excellent KS topic. > Personally, I am for stretching Linux as far across the compute spectrum > as it can possibly go. I'll second this for both a valid topic, and as a goal for Linux to achieve. greg k-h