From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD59C4D4 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A621FD47 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:38:56 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Grant Likely Message-ID: <20140515133856.GO27822@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <20140511030009.GO12708@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140511083729.211e9b5f@lwn.net> <20140515121546.3A06AC40B0E@trevor.secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140515121546.3A06AC40B0E@trevor.secretlab.ca> Cc: Rob Herring , Linux ARM Kernel , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] ARM legacy board DT conversion finalization List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, 11 May 2014 08:37:29 -0400, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Sat, 10 May 2014 23:00:09 -0400 > > Jason Cooper wrote: > > > > > So, I'm proposing a session where each sub-arch gives a brief run-down > > > of the status of the legacy board conversion, and wraps up with a todo > > > list. After all of the sub-arches have given their status (5 - 10 > > > minutes each?), we hash out helping each other with the final pieces. > > > > This *really* looks like an ARM minisummit topic to me; hopefully one > > of those is in the works? > > It does, doesn't it? I wouldn't want this as a main ksummit topic. > > The problem with ARM minisummits these days is it is very easy to > devolve into a nothing-but-dt meeting with a bunch of people sitting > around looking either annoyed or bored. We weren't able to pull enough > topics together when we tried to do an ARM minisummit at the ELC. > > Instead of a traditional ARM minisummit, perhaps we should do an ARM > platforms minisprint instead. Light on any kind of presentations, but > have the right people in the room to try and knock out some of the > legacy backlog (which is kind of what Jason described) Agreed. I think that would be an effective use of time and resources. thx, Jason.