From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] ARM legacy board DT conversion finalization
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 09:38:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140515133856.GO27822@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140515121546.3A06AC40B0E@trevor.secretlab.ca>
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, 11 May 2014 08:37:29 -0400, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 May 2014 23:00:09 -0400
> > Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > So, I'm proposing a session where each sub-arch gives a brief run-down
> > > of the status of the legacy board conversion, and wraps up with a todo
> > > list. After all of the sub-arches have given their status (5 - 10
> > > minutes each?), we hash out helping each other with the final pieces.
> >
> > This *really* looks like an ARM minisummit topic to me; hopefully one
> > of those is in the works?
>
> It does, doesn't it? I wouldn't want this as a main ksummit topic.
>
> The problem with ARM minisummits these days is it is very easy to
> devolve into a nothing-but-dt meeting with a bunch of people sitting
> around looking either annoyed or bored. We weren't able to pull enough
> topics together when we tried to do an ARM minisummit at the ELC.
>
> Instead of a traditional ARM minisummit, perhaps we should do an ARM
> platforms minisprint instead. Light on any kind of presentations, but
> have the right people in the room to try and knock out some of the
> legacy backlog (which is kind of what Jason described)
Agreed. I think that would be an effective use of time and resources.
thx,
Jason.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-15 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-11 3:00 Jason Cooper
2014-05-11 12:37 ` Jonathan Corbet
2014-05-11 13:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-05-11 14:22 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-15 12:15 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-15 13:38 ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2014-05-15 18:50 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-15 19:42 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-16 3:30 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-16 4:10 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-16 18:31 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-05-16 18:42 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-16 22:20 ` Ben Hutchings
2014-05-19 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-19 22:41 ` Peter Maydell
2014-05-19 23:06 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-20 8:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-22 14:44 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-23 13:48 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-23 14:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-23 13:46 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-23 13:40 ` Linus Walleij
2014-05-23 13:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-16 3:39 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140515133856.GO27822@titan.lakedaemon.net \
--to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox