From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E5A947 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 12:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f48.google.com (mail-ee0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84AAB20111 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 12:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f48.google.com with SMTP id e49so589005eek.21 for ; Thu, 15 May 2014 05:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Grant Likely From: Grant Likely To: Jonathan Corbet , Jason Cooper In-Reply-To: <20140511083729.211e9b5f@lwn.net> References: <20140511030009.GO12708@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20140511083729.211e9b5f@lwn.net> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:15:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20140515121546.3A06AC40B0E@trevor.secretlab.ca> Cc: Rob Herring , Linux ARM Kernel , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] ARM legacy board DT conversion finalization List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, 11 May 2014 08:37:29 -0400, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Sat, 10 May 2014 23:00:09 -0400 > Jason Cooper wrote: > > > So, I'm proposing a session where each sub-arch gives a brief run-down > > of the status of the legacy board conversion, and wraps up with a todo > > list. After all of the sub-arches have given their status (5 - 10 > > minutes each?), we hash out helping each other with the final pieces. > > This *really* looks like an ARM minisummit topic to me; hopefully one > of those is in the works? It does, doesn't it? I wouldn't want this as a main ksummit topic. The problem with ARM minisummits these days is it is very easy to devolve into a nothing-but-dt meeting with a bunch of people sitting around looking either annoyed or bored. We weren't able to pull enough topics together when we tried to do an ARM minisummit at the ELC. Instead of a traditional ARM minisummit, perhaps we should do an ARM platforms minisprint instead. Light on any kind of presentations, but have the right people in the room to try and knock out some of the legacy backlog (which is kind of what Jason described) g.