From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4356A4D3 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 11:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 374191F9D3 for ; Wed, 14 May 2014 11:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:09:57 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Wolfram Sang Message-ID: <20140514110957.GC22735@mwanda> References: <20140509170709.GA9747@redhat.com> <20140511111034.GA6400@katana> <53706EAB.7010601@monstr.eu> <20140512093235.GA2872@katana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140512093235.GA2872@katana> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] coverity, static checking etc. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:32:35AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > is sent. Why not just tell them run this in-kernel tool with all > > that checking enabled before you send the patch? > > make C=1 ? That could be perhaps updated to call sparse *and* smatch if > it finds them installed. Smatch doesn't install very well... :( I should try fix that before kernel summit. regards, dan carpenter