From: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] hobbyist recruiting
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 12:38:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140512163838.GA12708@titan.lakedaemon.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140511192630.GA14115@kroah.com>
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 09:26:30PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 09:16:02PM +0200, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> > Of course, the Eudyptula challenge did bring some new developers,
> > but as far as I see most of them posted only one patch/patchset.
>
> How do you know who is doing this challenge and who isn't? I see a lot
> of new people coming in with multiple sets of patches for cleanups and
> good fixes over the past month or so.
Is it mostly in the staging tree? That's where I really got my feet wet
when I started. Assisting with code cleanup isn't glamorous, but it's a
good place to learn the ropes. And the staging tree is, imho, a more
receptive place for cleanup patches. Since the code isn't kernel
qwality to begin with.
> Trying to track where they actually come from is nothing I really care
> about, and is probably impossible.
Agreed.
> If you track the number of unique people I take patches from, it's
> going up, as is our number of unique contributors to the kernel overall.
> It's been constantly increasing for the past 8 years, ever since I
> started tracking the kernel development statistics.
Cool, I didn't know you were actively tracking that. Is the data
publicly hosted? Is that based on merged patches, or posted emails?
> > Maybe, there is a way so that they will stay and work more?
>
> I have loads of work for people to do if they want to do it:
> drivers/staging/*/TODO
>
> > Keep them somehow in the game, i.e. badges? Mozilla's Open Badges?
>
> Gamifaction? Really? No.
Pointing to the TODO lists is sufficient. I don't think we would be
doing the community any favors by encouraging developers who want a
cookie for everything they did.
My primary goal is to draw attention to the issue of aggressive mail
filtering, new devs can pop up anywhere, and acknowledging them. By
acknowledge, I mean answering the email, and treating them like everyone
else. But we have to spot the emails first.
thx,
Jason.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-11 5:30 Jason Cooper
2014-05-11 17:57 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-05-11 19:16 ` Levente Kurusa
2014-05-11 19:26 ` Greg KH
2014-05-11 19:50 ` Levente Kurusa
2014-05-11 20:33 ` Hans Verkuil
2014-05-11 21:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-05-12 8:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-12 8:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-12 9:08 ` Li Zefan
2014-05-12 9:40 ` Hans Verkuil
2014-05-12 9:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-12 13:58 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-05-12 16:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2014-05-21 14:32 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-12 16:38 ` Jason Cooper [this message]
2014-05-12 23:23 ` Greg KH
2014-05-16 3:47 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140512163838.GA12708@titan.lakedaemon.net \
--to=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox