From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FC12FA for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 04:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 00:14:49 -0400 From: Jason Cooper To: Levente Kurusa , Teodora =?utf-8?B?QsSDbHXFo8SD?= , Konstantin Ryabitsev Message-ID: <20140511041449.GP12708@titan.lakedaemon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] QR encoded oops for the kernel List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , All, I recently came across a patch series attempting to implement encoding kernel oops into a QR code [1]. The QR code is then dumped to the framebuffer. The QR code is a URL of the form: https://oops.kernel.org/?qr=3D This proposal is interesting because it fundamentally changes the way users report bugs to the kernel community. First and foremost, it makes it much easier. 1) oops occurs 2) user pulls out phone, scans QR code - at this point, the oops is recorded on the server. Nothing more is required of the user. optionally: 3) user fills out a minimal web form - Name - email address (do you want to receive emails re this oops?) - what were you doing when it occurred? - is it repeatable? I recall discussing this with some RedHat devs at the 2012 KS, so I know there is some interest in this capability. I'd be interested in having this as a tech topic for several reasons. First, to raise awareness of the project among the kernel community (where did all these oops reports start coming from?). Second, to solicit opinions on how to feed those oops reports into the community. And last, to sit down with the maintainer of oops.kernel.org and scope out what work needs to be done to support this on the server side. Of course, all of this assumes the patches get accepted. There's been no rejections so far, though. :) If accepted, I would expect the authors to be the ones leading the discussion (Levente, Teodora). Nominations: Levente Kurusa Teodora B=C4=83lu=C5=A3=C4=83 Relevant folks: Konstantin Ryabitsev Jason Cooper (auto-nominated) ... thx, Jason. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/17/525