From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] coverity, static checking etc.
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:33:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140509203307.GA20593@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5857276.jy6b86PZuN@wuerfel>
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:18:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 09 May 2014 13:07:09 Dave Jones wrote:
> > I gave a lightning talk on this last year. This year I have a bit more data
> > so could probably fill a whole session.
> >
> > Last year I had been doing the coverity scans on an almost daily basis
> > for 2-3 months. Now that we're a year in, I'd like to share some
> > results, and show some of the more common trends and bug patterns that
> > seem to pop up.
> >
> > [ spoiler: For the most part, it's all pretty positive, but we still suck ]
> >
> > It would also be good to have some more discussion about other tools
> > we could be making more use of. (Nomination: Dan Carpenter for smatch).
>
> I'd be interested in this. One thing I'd been meaning to ask you about
> for ages is what I can do to get scan results for ARM (or any other
> architecture for that matter) specific code. We have a lot of that these
> days, and as I understand it, the results on the public website are just
> for x86 builds.
yeah, right now their tool (definitely front-end, but back-end too iirc)
is x86 only. So unless it's something that CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST would pick up,
it's not going to be in the scans.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-09 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-09 17:07 Dave Jones
2014-05-09 17:19 ` josh
2014-05-09 17:31 ` Johannes Berg
2014-05-09 17:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-09 18:04 ` Mark Brown
2014-05-09 19:08 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-05-09 19:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-05-09 19:29 ` Josh Triplett
2014-05-09 17:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-05-09 20:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-09 20:33 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2014-05-09 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-09 20:33 ` Roland Dreier
2014-05-09 20:52 ` Dave Jones
2014-05-09 20:57 ` tytso
2014-05-14 11:06 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-11 11:10 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-12 6:48 ` Michal Simek
2014-05-12 9:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-14 11:09 ` Dan Carpenter
2014-05-14 13:32 ` Johannes Berg
2014-05-14 13:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-05-14 15:22 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-14 15:44 ` Peter Huewe
2014-05-14 16:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-18 16:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2014-05-19 10:13 ` Michal Simek
2014-05-12 8:58 ` Peter Senna Tschudin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140509203307.GA20593@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox