From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F64A89 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 17:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5D920364 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 17:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 10:17:18 -0700 From: josh@joshtriplett.org To: Josh Boyer Message-ID: <20140509171718.GB8289@cloud> References: <20140509165519.GA8289@cloud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Nominations for per topic people List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:00:58PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:55 PM, wrote: > > Kernel tinification had several more mentioned. (Some of them are already > > a given, but not all.) > > Literally everyone in your initial email that was on CC was already on > the list. Most of the thread participants were as well. If I've > missed someone, please nominate! The original kernel summit mail suggested that not everyone on the autogenerated list would get an invite, and in fact that the autogenerated list had twice as many people on it as the normal size of the invite list. Based on that, I assumed that explicit nominations and notes of good topic participants would carry some weight even for people on the autogenerated list. - Josh Triplett