From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34504A89 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 17:07:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBB020259 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 17:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s49H7G18020141 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 13:07:17 -0400 Received: from gelk.kernelslacker.org ([10.3.113.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s49H7AWx005832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 13:07:15 -0400 Received: from gelk.kernelslacker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gelk.kernelslacker.org (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s49H79Vw009926 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 13:07:09 -0400 Received: (from davej@localhost) by gelk.kernelslacker.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s49H79TJ009925 for ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org; Fri, 9 May 2014 13:07:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 13:07:09 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Message-ID: <20140509170709.GA9747@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] coverity, static checking etc. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , I gave a lightning talk on this last year. This year I have a bit more data so could probably fill a whole session. Last year I had been doing the coverity scans on an almost daily basis for 2-3 months. Now that we're a year in, I'd like to share some results, and show some of the more common trends and bug patterns that seem to pop up. [ spoiler: For the most part, it's all pretty positive, but we still suck ] It would also be good to have some more discussion about other tools we could be making more use of. (Nomination: Dan Carpenter for smatch). Dave