From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846B3AED for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 15:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [74.207.234.97]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C047A20330 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 15:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 11:40:35 -0400 From: Theodore Ts'o To: Josh Boyer Message-ID: <20140509154035.GE15523@thunk.org> References: <20140509152319.GA26823@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Reminder for kernel summit nominations List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , -linux-kernel On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 11:28:05AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Thanks for all of the discussions on the kernel summit discuss list. > > Thanks also for the three (3) nomination e-mails (and one person who > > said they definitely weren't attending, so we could remove him from > > consideration) which people have sent in. > > Were nominations required to be entirely separate email threads? > There were a few suggestions for attendees made in the topic threads > that don't seem to be reflected in the nominations list. It's possible I missed some, which is why separate nomination threads is easier. I deliberately didn't include lists of names of "people that would be useful if we're going to have discussion X", since we that presupposes that we are definitely going to have a particular discussion. If you see someone who you think should attend regardless of whether we decide to include topic X, please send a separate nomination. (Also note that we can't necessarily include everyone listed on a "useful for topic X" list even if we are going to include that topic on the agenda. We'll try to use some good judgement, but some kind of priority listing or annotation of why someone was included, i.e., "we need at least one of Foo and Bar from the glibc community, and either Quux or Baz from the systemd community, etc.) Thanks!! - Ted