From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D99979 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 18:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.231]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C372032B for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 18:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 14:32:47 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Christoph Lameter Message-ID: <20140509143247.56c2a924@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <1399595490.2230.13.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <20140509122451.5228a038@gandalf.local.home> <1399657343.2166.61.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sarah Sharp , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Greg KH , James Bottomley , Julia Lawall , Darren Hart , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Kernel tinification: shrinking the kernel and avoiding size regressions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 9 May 2014 12:52:00 -0500 (CDT) Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 9 May 2014, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > Global optimization may allow the folding of small functions into a larger > > > one when advantageous (which is not simple to determine). > > > > It's possible, but complex ... I'd really like to see proof that it > > helps before thinking about it. > > The proof may mean that one will have to do the work. Hello Chicken, meet Egg! This is what proof of concepts are for. -- Steve