From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4580492F for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F8392033D for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 14:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 16:15:03 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Dan Carpenter Message-ID: <20140507141503.GB12433@quack.suse.cz> References: <53662254.9060100@huawei.com> <53699F27.9040403@hitachi.com> <1399431538.2581.30.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140507090628.GZ26890@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140507090628.GZ26890@mwanda> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed 07-05-14 12:06:28, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:58:58PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > I tend to think of LTP as a nice way of doing unit-tests for the uapi. > > Fengguang's scripts do include it, iirc, but I'm referring more to unit > > level tests. It serves well for changes in ipc, and should also for > > other subsystems. > > LTP is too complicated and enterprisey. With trinity you don't can just > type: > > ./configure.sh && make && ./trinity > > With LTP you have to read the install documents. You can't run it > from your home directory so you have to build a virtual machine which > you don't care about before you install it. Actually, I'm occasionally using LTP and it doesn't seem too bad to me. And it seems LTP is improving over time so I'm mostly happy about it. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR