From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05B270A for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 08:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arkanian.console-pimps.org (arkanian.console-pimps.org [212.110.184.194]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B6620252 for ; Wed, 7 May 2014 08:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 09:39:36 +0100 From: Matt Fleming To: Masami Hiramatsu Message-ID: <20140507083936.GY26088@console-pimps.org> References: <53662254.9060100@huawei.com> <53699F27.9040403@hitachi.com> <1399431538.2581.30.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <5369EE59.9040805@hitachi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5369EE59.9040805@hitachi.com> Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] stable issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 07 May, at 05:27:05PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > IOW, would the test cases be better to be out-of-tree or in-tree? If it is > out-of-tree(like LTP), how can we maintain both test-cases and upstream kernels? > What infrastructure should we have (e.g. bugzilla which provides a database for > relationship between bug# and test-case) ? > Those are my interests :) There's definitely huge merit in having in-tree tests like the current selftests stuff because it allows you to roll up fixes and regression tests into a single commit, see commit 123abd76edf5 ("efivars: efivarfs_valid_name() should handle pstore syntax"). -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center