From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6B799F
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  6 May 2014 21:00:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net
	[217.70.183.195])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2B162022F
	for <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue,  6 May 2014 21:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 14:00:07 -0700
From: josh@joshtriplett.org
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Message-ID: <20140506210007.GA21791@cloud>
References: <CALCETrU_xrdgUNF55YU+8rfq2xK0cU3QybQhqvX4L8OgsiwG5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140506190024.GA1004@kroah.com>
	<20140506160740.1245d1f4@gandalf.local.home>
	<20140506203426.GA15428@jtriplet-mobl1>
	<20140506164201.69611e7d@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140506164201.69611e7d@gandalf.local.home>
Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Reviewing new API/ABI
List-Id: <ksummit-discuss.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss>,
	<mailto:ksummit-discuss-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:42:01PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2014 13:34:26 -0700
> Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:07:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 6 May 2014 12:00:24 -0700
> > > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > We do have linux-api, which should be cc:ed for new api additions.  But
> > > > it usually isn't :(
> > > 
> > > That's the first I've heard of that list. Maybe that's the reason it
> > > hasn't been cc'd much. Hard to Cc lists that you don't know about.
> > > 
> > > /me goes to look in MAINTAINERS for linux-api mailing list. Nope, not
> > > there.
> > 
> > Here's a patch:
> > 
> > ---8<---
> > >From 424c7365ed5ed64190a1d08fe30c8e86832368b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> > Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 13:20:25 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add linux-api for review of API/ABI changes
> > 
> > This makes it more likely that patch submitters will CC API/ABI changes
> > to the linux-api list, and tools like get_maintainer.pl will do so
> > automatically.
> > 
> 
> Although patches need to go to LKML.
> 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Resent to LKML.