From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH] code-of-conduct: Remove explicit list of discrimination factors
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2018 20:18:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1814283.64diKEr4zR@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181007113514.GA21217@localhost>
Hi Josh,
On Sunday, 7 October 2018 14:35:14 EEST Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Providing an explicit list of discrimination factors may give the false
> > impression that discrimination based on other unlisted factors would be
> > allowed.
> >
> > Avoid any ambiguity by removing the list, to ensure "a harassment-free
> > experience for everyone", period.
>
> I would suggest reading the commit message that added this in the first
> place. "Explicit guidelines have demonstrated success in other projects
> and other areas of the kernel." See also various comparisons of codes of
> conduct, which make the same point. The point of this list is precisely
> to serve as one such explicit guideline; removing it would rather defeat
> the purpose.
>
> In any case, this is not the appropriate place for such patches, any
> more than it's the place for patches to the GPL.
So what's an appropriate place to discuss the changes that we would like,
*together*, to make to the current document and propose upstream ? As stated
in another e-mail in a similar thread, I believe we need to come together and
decide on what we want to do. We still have no official forum to do so, and
repeatedly telling people that ksummit-discuss and LKML are not the right
place won't make the concerns go away. Only by discussing problems will we
come to solutions.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-07 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-07 8:51 Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-07 11:35 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-07 17:18 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2018-10-08 2:29 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-08 14:12 ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 14:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-10-08 14:36 ` Tim.Bird
2018-10-08 14:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-08 15:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-08 8:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-08 12:02 ` Mark Brown
2018-10-08 15:42 ` Alan Cox
2018-10-08 16:14 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-10 20:55 ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-10 21:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-10 22:16 ` Josh Triplett
[not found] ` <20181010223319.GA31256@thyrsus.com>
2018-10-10 23:35 ` Frank Rowand
2018-10-17 7:19 Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-17 9:13 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-17 9:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-17 13:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-17 15:22 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-17 15:21 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-17 15:49 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-17 16:00 ` Josh Triplett
2018-10-17 18:36 ` Mark Brown
2018-10-17 13:45 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-10-17 16:18 ` Joe Perches
2018-10-22 21:06 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1814283.64diKEr4zR@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox