From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62FDBF99 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0626971C for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:05:45 +0000 (UTC) From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <87y3cfymgr.fsf@intel.com> References: <87y3cfymgr.fsf@intel.com> <17533.1536166384@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <32341.1536178494@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Jani Nikula MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <17242.1536228343.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 11:05:43 +0100 Message-ID: <17243.1536228343@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Cc: James Bottomley , joeyli.kernel@gmail.com, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Justin Forbes , Peter Jones , Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TOPIC] Kernel lockdown and secure boot List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jani Nikula wrote: > I guess I'm asking, have you considered an audit log for lockdown > blocked access, and if you've rejected the idea, why? It logs a message to dmesg telling you what caused the rejection. David