From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C73B413 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 22:50:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl (cloudserver094114.home.net.pl [79.96.170.134]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65DFC10E for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 22:50:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Joerg Roedel Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:55:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1717921.V18WFsHkxD@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <20160809223118.GG1437@8bytes.org> References: <20160809223118.GG1437@8bytes.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Regression tracking List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:31:18 AM Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:02:22PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Yeah, definitely. One afaics important part that needs to be done in > > this area: make bugzilla.kernel.org work better. At least some (or maybe > > even quite a lot?) of the bugs reported there afaics seem to not get > > proper attention from the right people. Due to that I'd assume some > > testers will have come to conclusions like "testing for regressions and > > bugs is not worth the trouble, as the kernel developers are not > > interested in the bugs I file anyway". > > In my case, I am only looking into the kernel.org bugzilla if someone > pings me about it. Usually I get the upstream bug reports via email. And > this is part of the problem, that we have multiple ways that we teach > users how to report bugs/regressions. That really increases the effort > needed for you to compile the regression list and keep track of > everything in there. > > So the right step here is to discuss how we want to get bugs reported > and settle on a single way we tell the users and testers. From there it > is much easier to get the reports dispatched to the right people. I need to mention here that PM and ACPI regressions in bugzilla.kernel.org are actually tracked by a team at Intel. We track all of the PM and ACPI bugs filed via the BZ, including regressions, and we're going to be doing that. Thanks, Rafael