From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC9C287C for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [66.63.167.143]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 976C3623 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1539701896.2805.7.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: James Bottomley To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 07:58:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1539701820.2805.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <1539701820.2805.6.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-kernel Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v3 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , The current code of conduct has an ambiguity in the it considers publishing private information such as email addresses unacceptable behaviour. Since the Linux kernel collects and publishes email addresses as part of the patch process, add an exception clause for email addresses ordinarily collected by the project to correct this ambiguity. Fixes: 8a104f8b5867c682 ("Code of Conduct: Let's revamp it.") Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Acked-by: Shuah Khan Acked-by: Guenter Roeck Reviewed-by: Alan Cox Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Acked-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst index ab7c24b5478c..aa40e34e7785 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/code-of-conduct.rst @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: * Trolling, insulting/derogatory comments, and personal or political attacks * Public or private harassment * Publishing others’ private information, such as a physical or electronic - address, without explicit permission + address not ordinarily collected by the project, without explicit permission * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a professional setting -- 2.13.7