From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51190C34 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [66.63.167.143]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39D2DA8 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1537748495.15095.4.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: James Bottomley To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 17:21:35 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TECH TALK] WireGuard: Next-Generation Secure Kernel Network Tunnel List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 02:12 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Confusingly, this talk was actually accepted for the main refereed > track at Plumbers, which probably makes more sense anyway for it. So > I should probably retract this submission. > > However, the more important and relevant talk -- the one on Zinc -- > is really quite appropriate for the kernel track and is sure to spur > a lot of needed discussion. So please focus attention on that > instead. Just so you know, this is the only email on the ksummit discuss list I've seen from you ... there isn't one proposing either zinc or wireguard as a tech topic. The list archive also only sees this email from you: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/ so there may be an issue with your outgoing server. James