From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9870982 for ; Mon, 26 May 2014 12:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from v094114.home.net.pl (v094114.home.net.pl [79.96.170.134]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B98DA1FA42 for ; Mon, 26 May 2014 12:06:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:23:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1529835.H0O99ObTAN@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <20140525085909.GA2702@katana> References: <1400925225.6956.25.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <5380F092.3070600@roeck-us.net> <20140525085909.GA2702@katana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [TOPIC] Encouraging more reviewers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sunday, May 25, 2014 10:59:09 AM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Problem with that is that in most company hierarchies code reviewers > > get little if no credit for their work. > > I was more aiming for upstream reviewers being paid for upstream review. > And not so much aiming for work on company level. Without knowing > details, GregKH being hired by the Linux Foundation looks like a good > example to me. There are so many $$$ around in the Linux market, there > should be some left to keep (and better: improve) the quality we all > appreciate. There is one more angle to that. Namely, it would be good if at least some reviewers were seen as independent of any particular company. Rafael