ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
To: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
	<ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	"tytso@mit.edu" <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Maintainer's Summit 2017 Feedback Thread
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:29:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1509380953.3660.28.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171029100816.pmq5dpmck4cclmdw@thunk.org>

On Sun, 2017-10-29 at 06:08 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Please reply to this thread if you have any comments about how we can
> organize the Maintainer's Summit for next year.  Given that Linus
> seemed fairly happy with how things went, it's likely we will stick
> with the same format for next year, but if there are any details about
> how we could do things better, I'd greatly appreciate them.

Hello Ted,

Something that surprised me is although I'm reading Linus' replies to pull
requests that appear on the LKML mailing list that during the maintainer
summit I learned more about what Linus expects from maintainers than by
reading Linus' e-mails. I think this shows that reading Linus' e-mails is
not enough to learn what Linus expects from maintainers. This made me wonder
how maintainers are informed about what is expected from them, especially
new maintainers? Do we perhaps need a document in the kernel tree that
explains what is expected from maintainers?

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-30 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-29 10:08 Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-30 16:29 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2017-10-30 16:32   ` Dan Williams
2017-10-30 18:45     ` Mimi Zohar
2017-10-30 17:42 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-30 21:03   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-30 21:20   ` Greg KH
2017-10-30 21:24     ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2017-10-30 21:27       ` James Bottomley
2017-10-30 21:27     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-10-30 21:43       ` greg
2017-10-30 22:36         ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-30 18:46 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-10-30 23:10 ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1509380953.3660.28.camel@wdc.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox