From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] Maintainer's Summit Agenda Planning
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2017 10:04:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507568645.3552.10.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507568189.3100.29.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 09:56 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> I was actually thinking we validate the script
That's the hard part.
Completeness and correctness are non trivial.
> and if there are no problems, apply it at -rc1
I also think that might be the best mechanism.
> However, if we agree a
> curation path for the script, the application could be done by Jíři as
> a pull from the trivial tree (unless Linus wanted to do it himself or
> someone else wanted to manage this).
Perhaps a kbuild robot variant could be utilized here.
Many changes should produce no object code differences
and validation of the correctness of the changes might
be better done using compilation comparison tools.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-05 19:20 Theodore Ts'o
2017-10-05 20:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-10-05 21:55 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-06 14:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-10-06 15:27 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-06 16:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-06 16:32 ` Jonathan Corbet
2017-10-06 16:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-06 16:56 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-06 17:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-06 20:11 ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-09 8:13 ` Mark Brown
2017-10-09 15:54 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-09 16:37 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-09 16:47 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-09 16:49 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-09 16:56 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-09 17:04 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-10-11 18:51 ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-12 10:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-10-16 14:12 ` James Bottomley
2017-10-16 14:25 ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-16 16:07 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-17 8:34 ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-18 1:27 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-18 10:41 ` Jani Nikula
2017-10-16 18:52 ` Mark Brown
2017-10-10 8:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-10-24 23:03 ` Kees Cook
2017-10-24 23:41 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-25 0:54 ` Kees Cook
2017-10-25 4:21 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-25 4:29 ` Joe Perches
2017-10-25 4:36 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-25 6:05 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-25 6:55 ` Kees Cook
2017-10-25 7:34 ` Martin K. Petersen
2017-10-25 6:45 ` Frank Rowand
2017-10-25 7:56 ` Mark Brown
2017-10-25 9:39 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-10-31 19:19 ` Rob Herring
2017-10-31 19:28 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507568645.3552.10.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox