From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
ksummit <ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] Bug reporting feedback loop
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 08:34:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1498145649.3989.11.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1de3c642-a4b7-1065-5c35-ba32866d471d@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2017-06-21 at 15:34 -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> Fedora tends to follow the most recent stable kernel very closely
> (e.g. 4.11.6 is currently pending for Fedora 24, 25, and 26).
> This works well enough, but there still seem to be some
> disconnects in the bug reporting process. Examples I can think of:
>
> - When users report bugs on the Fedora tracker that look like
> actual upstream bugs, what's the best way to have those reported?
> I typically end up having to summarize from the Fedora bugzilla
> and send an e-mail which ends up being tedious. Can we make this
> bug reporting easier for non-kernel developers?
The way we handle bugzilla.kernel.org in SCSI is that it's vectored on
to the linux-scsi mailing list and bugzilla then captures the email
interactions. Can this be done with distro bugzillas as well? You'd
still have to write the initial summary email and send it to the list
and add the cc to the bugzilla, but thereafter your bugzilla should
capture the interaction. In our system, the reporter can use bugzilla
to interact with the list, because every bug report is vectored there
based on subsystem. In your bugzillas, I think you can add the list as
a watcher of the bug, so if the original reporter adds something it
will get sent to the list.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-22 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-21 22:34 Laura Abbott
2017-06-22 12:36 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-06-27 17:53 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-27 18:26 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-06-27 18:30 ` James Bottomley
2017-06-27 18:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-06-27 19:02 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-27 19:46 ` Guenter Roeck
2017-06-28 10:19 ` Mark Brown
2017-06-27 22:35 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-06-28 6:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-06-27 18:31 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-06-27 19:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-28 8:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-06-22 14:08 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-06-22 14:12 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-06-22 14:24 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-06-28 13:12 ` Jani Nikula
2017-06-28 13:13 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-06-22 15:34 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2017-06-23 14:52 ` Greg KH
2017-06-23 20:28 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-06-25 17:11 ` Laura Abbott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1498145649.3989.11.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox