From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <1473834432.32273.21.camel@perches.com> From: Joe Perches To: Julia Lawall Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 23:27:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20160913194520.GA8071@cloud> <20160913140322.3ccad27c@lwn.net> <4691924.fimvUkKjuv@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160914020332.GA9558@cloud> <1473819862.32273.16.camel@perches.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] checkpatch/Codingstyle and trivial patch spam List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 07:57 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > What types of changes are unacceptable? It's a mixed bag. Some maintainers reject all "style/whitespace changes". Some maintainers reject global consistency patches like int -> bool conversions. Some maintainers reject literal -> #define changes like 1 -> true and 0 -> false for booleans. Some of those maintainers are IMO misguided.