From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A440D89E for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pure.motives.com (pure.motives.com [207.192.71.45]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 317CE283 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1472500307.4534.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Karen Sandler To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:51:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1472499769.4534.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1472403654.2420.29.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20160829090703.1c063975@gandalf.local.home> <1472486062.2376.26.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20160829121615.25e5ddce@gandalf.local.home> <1472499769.4534.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Bottomley , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Owning your own copyrights in Linux List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 15:42 -0400, Karen Sandler wrote: > This has all been quite a discussion! Apologies, my reply was for the other thread that inspired this one (I already reposted my email in the right place in the other thread for archival purposes). To comment briefly on this thread, I think the session James proposed is important and developers should endeavor to keep their own copyrights where that makes sense. If I'm around, I'd be happy to participate and talk about Conservancy's ContractPatch [1] initiative and if not, I hope attendees get in touch to collaborate! karen [1] https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2016/aug/04/everything-is-negotiable/