On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 13:48 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, David Howells wrote: > >  (3) Let's use bool a lot more for boolean values as the compiler might be > >      able to make better choices with it. > > This would be particularly useful for boolean one-bit struct bitfield > flags (not least because assigning any positive even number to unsigned > int foo:1 will result in 0) *but* we've found gcc produces worse code > for bool:1 in our case. Details at [1]. > > BR, > Jani. > > > [1] http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463148278-23193-1-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com In that entire discussion I don't see any mention of a GCC PR being filed. Why? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation