From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6821FBC9 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 23:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3990812C for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 23:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1436485273.24408.4.camel@infradead.org> From: David Woodhouse To: Darren Hart Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 00:41:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150709233854.GE111846@vmdeb7> References: <201507080121.41463.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> <559C73DF.2030008@roeck-us.net> <20150708114011.3a1f1861@noble> <2879113.fraeuJIr2M@avalon> <20150709193718.GD9169@vmdeb7> <1436481109.3324.219.camel@infradead.org> <20150709233854.GE111846@vmdeb7> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Jason Cooper Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Recruitment (Reviewers, Testers, Maintainers, Hobbyists) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 16:38 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > since we're talking about recruiting, my point was by implementing > some of these things we can maintain our standards while reducing > maintainer/reviewer overhead. Hopefully, yes. But people actually have to *use* the tools and services we provide. Like checkpatch. Rather than seeing them as part of the problem. -- dwmw2