ksummit.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] GPL enforcement actions
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 09:06:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1435997161.3324.33.camel@infradead.org> (raw)

I'm slightly loath to bring this up but I think it does need doing...

There are various people involved with GPL enforcement actions for the
kernel, and there seems to be a lot of misinformation about it all. 

Some parties are portrayed as acting excessively and inappropriately —
and with dubious motives — to enforce the GPL; others as being rabidly
*against* enforcement and effectively wanting a BSD-licensed free-for
-all because that supports their corporate interests.

None of these portrayals are entirely accurate, I'm sure, and the
histrionics don't really do anyone any good.

I'm sure we won't reach a universal consensus, but it would be useful
to get the interested parties together and have a coherent discussion
about it, so that everyone can have a proper understanding of the fact,
and also a reasonable idea of the 'feeling in the room' regarding if,
when and how we require compliance with the GPL.

-- 
dwmw2

             reply	other threads:[~2015-07-04  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-04  8:06 David Woodhouse [this message]
2015-07-04 10:18 ` David Howells
2015-07-04 16:49   ` David Woodhouse
2015-07-07 18:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-07-07 19:51   ` David Woodhouse
2015-07-07 20:00     ` Greg KH
2015-07-07 20:18       ` David Woodhouse
2015-07-07 22:11         ` John W. Linville
2015-07-08 15:41         ` Tim Bird
2015-07-08 21:25           ` Greg KH
2015-07-08 22:55             ` Tim Bird
2015-07-07 20:33     ` Chris Mason
2015-07-07 22:15       ` Luck, Tony
2015-07-07 23:55         ` Chris Mason
2015-07-07 21:06     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-07-31 18:45       ` Christoph Lameter
2015-07-31 19:06         ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1435997161.3324.33.camel@infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox